Chapter 6: General Contractor/Construction Management (GC/CM) D-Forms Process

Chapter 6: General Contractor/Construction Management (GC/CM) D-Forms Process

Updated August 2026

D-Forms serve as the official application process for accessing funds through the School Construction Assistance Program (SCAP). They are the primary documents that form the basis of agreements between OSPI and the school districts receiving SCAP fundings. See Chapter 3: School Construction Assistance Program (SCAP) Eligibility for more information. 

This chapter provides guidance on the D-Form process as it applies to General Contractor/Construction Management (GC/CM) projects.

601: (GC/CM) D-Forms Overview

601: (GC/CM) D-Forms Overview

Early in the planning stage, a school district should work with its OSPI Regional Coordinator (See "Participants, Roles and Partnerships" in the Introduction section of this manual) to determine if it has School Construction Assistance Program (SCAP) eligibility that can be used toward one or multiple projects (See Chapter 3: School Construction Assistance Program Eligibility).

The application process of requesting SCAP funding assistance for a project begins with the submission of form D-3, OSPI approval of that form and then the issuance of form D-4. However, before a district can submit form D-3, it must have a completed an approved Study and Survey report, which verifies square footages of district facilities, updates the district long-term capital plan, looks at its bond-to-debt capacity, among other things. (See Chapter 11: Advanced Planning—The Study and Survey).

Once a project has begun with the application process by being issued a D-4, there are several steps the district must reach during the design phase before it will be allowed to sign construction contracts (or, in the case of certain alternate public works, the final GMP, or Guaranteed Maximum Price). This chapter details each step of the D-Form, how those steps can vary depending on the project delivery method, key deadlines for districts to pay attention to, lessons learned and more.

SCAP is a unique grant program in that the funds are not yet available to be issued to the district at the point when it begins this application process. The purpose of the D-form process is to help OSPI determine a project’s status, progress, and viability so that OSPI can make a formal request for the funds to the Legislature on the district’s behalf.

In its current form, SCAP is mainly designed for a Design-Bid-Build (DBB) project delivery method but can also accommodate General Contractor/Construction Manager (GC/CM) and Design-Build (DB) methods. See Chapter 4: Project Procurement Methods Supported by SCAP. This chapter will outline the process of the D-Forms by the three procurement types it can accommodate (DBB, GC/CM and DB). 

D-Forms Summary Chart (For General Contractor/Construction Management Projects) 

D-Form Application Highlights Approval (Issued by OSPI) Deadline for Next D-Form Application
D-1: Study and Survey Grant Application
  • Project Planning
  • Certify Facility Inventory
D-2 The district must have an updated and approved Study and Survey within six years of submitting a D-3. OSPI reserves the right to request an update to that Study and Survey within that six-year period.

D-3: Project Application

Occurs when submitted a project for SCAP funding

  • Eligibility Calculation
D-4 A D-5 is due one year (or sooner) after receiving a D-4
D-5: Application for Preliminary Funding Status
  • Environmental Review (SEPA)
  • Site Visit by Regional Coordinator
D-6 A D-7 is due one year (or sooner) after receiving a D-6 or D-6(1)

D-7: Application to Negotiate the MACC

For GCCM, a D-8 or D-8(1) (see "Front-Funding versus Non-Front-Funding" in this chapter) is not required before establishing or bidding mini-MACC's. Unlike Design-Bid-Build projects, where the D-8/D-8(1) is associated with authorization to proceed with the construction bid, GCCM projects may establish and bid mini-MACC's before the D-8/D-8(1) is submitted. However, mini-MACC's may not include direct construction of the building, including groundbreaking (see "001: Terms Used" in the introduction chapter for details on groundbreaking). 

  • Contracts
  • Cost Estimates
  • Area Analysis
  • Agency Approvals
D-8

A D-9 is due 90 days after receiving a D-8 or D-8(1). If the project is estimated at least 10 percent over budget and the school district can show that, it can request an extension of an extra 90 days. This must be approved by OSPI, however. 

When making this request, MACC amendments to this point must be submitted to OSPI. OSPI may consider the extent of bidding completed when reviewing the amendment, as bids received for only a portion of the MACC may not provide enough information to determine whether the project is actually over budget.

D-9: Application for Authorization to Sign MACC Agreement

A D-10 or D-10(1) must be received before the final MACC can be signed

  • Advertisements
  • Bid Tabulation
  • Bid Form
  • Final Billings
D-10 Projects cannot break ground on building until D-10(1) or D-10. See "001: Terms Used" in the Introduction chapter for more information on "breaking ground."
D-11: Application to Release Retainage
  • Final Payment to General Contractor
D-12  

 Contact your OSPI Regional Coordinator with questions. 

602: (GCCM) Form D-1/D-2: Study and Survey Grant Application

602: (GCCM) Form D-1/D-2: Study and Survey Grant Application

The D-1 is an application for reimbursement for the Study and Survey (See Chapter 11: Advance Planning--The Study and Survey). The intent of the Study and Survey is to update and have certified by an architect the school district’s facilities inventory, update its long-term capital plan, communicate the district’s financial status, among other things. This includes a PDF report submitted to OSPI, as well as an update of the inventory in ICOS. A Study and Survey must have been submitted and approved within six years of submitting a D-3 (applying for SCAP funding support of a project). Once the D-1 has been submitted and the Study and Survey has been received and approved by OSPI, a D-2 is awarded allowing the district to submit a claim for reimbursement.

603: Front Funding versus Non-Front-Funding

603: Front Funding versus Non-Front-Funding

Front-funding is when a district applying for SCAP funding certifies that it has the financial capacity to pay the full project cost without relying on the state assistance. The district may proceed past a D-8 with the project before SCAP funding is available. Historically, SCAP funding has been released annually in July. However, funding is not guaranteed until the Legislature passes the capital budget. Once the capital budget is passed and the project has met the applicable funding milestones, OSPI releases the state assistance funds. 

Front-funding allows the district to proceed with bidding and construction before the annual July release of state assistance funds. If a district is dependent on the state's share of project funding, the project cannot be front-funded and is therefore considered non-front-funded. In that case, bidding and construction activities must be scheduled to occur after the state assistance funds have been released. This does not apply to mini-MACC's or early work packages involving non-building construction in GC/CM and Progressive Design-Build projects. These activities may proceed before the release of state assistance funds; however, the school district assumes the financial risk for proceeding before those funds are available. 

What the "(1)" Means

For front-funded projects whose SCAP funds have not yet been released, OSPI issues a D-6(1), D-8(1), and D-10(1) in place of the standard D-6, D-8, and D-10. The "(1)" designation indicates that the project has been authorized to proceed under the front-funding provisions, but the project's SCAP funds have not yet been released. Once the state assistance funds are released, OSPI issues a standard D-10, replacing the D-10(1), to confirm that the project's SCAP funds have been secured. The "(1)" designation also authorizes the project to proceed with applicable milestones that would otherwise require the state funds to have been released.

604: (GCCM) Form D-3/D-4: Application for Project Approval

604: (GCCM) Form D-3/D-4: Application for Project Approval

D-3/D-4 (Application for Project Approval)

The D-3 is an application for state funding assistance for a new, new-in-lieu (replacement) or modernization project with state funding assistance. 

After a district has secured or is near to securing local funds through a bond, levy, impact fees or other source. Projects cannot proceed past D-4 if local funds are not yet secured. Submit an individual D-3 for separate projects.  

D-4 approvals are issued by OSPI on the 15th day of every month. D-3 forms must be submitted at least four-to-six weeks prior to the D-4 issuance date.  

Key D-4 Dates: 

  • The last business day in October before the November 15th D-4 issuance date is the final opportunity for the year to capture the prior year's enrollment projections (Form 1049).

  • A project must have received a D-4 by January 31st, and the district must be able to certify funding for the project (either total project costs or local share) to be eligible for that year's release of funds.

D-3 Items Submission Checklist (For GC/CM Projects)

Item No. Item Notes
1 Resolution with Signatures of Authorized District Personnel This determines who at the district will have signing rights for this project throughout the D-Form process. See "Setting Up D-Form Authorized Signees" below.
2 Resolution: New-in-Lieu Replacement Option (If Applicable) For new-in-lieu (replacement option) only. This resolution holds that the district will not use the space that is being replaced using SCAP funds for any K-12 instructional purposes henceforth. (WAC 392-347-042)
3 Form 1066: Students with Disabilities Enrollment Counts the number of students with developmental disabilities (as reported on actual October headcount enrollment) who are assigned to a specially designated self-contained classroom for at least 100 minutes per school day and pre-kindergarten students with disabilities at 50 percent of the actual headcount enrollment. 

Setting up D-Form Authorize Signees

Individuals included on the Resolution with Signatures of Authorized District Personnel will each need to create an EDS account to be able to sign D-Forms (this can be done at the EDS web page) and then given access to the district’s ICOS profile (see "Set up and Access" in Chapter 2: Inventory and Condition of Schools)

The project architect will also need to have an EDS account and have access to the district’s ICOS profile in order to e-sign the Estimate of Construction at D-7.  

605: (GCCM) Form D-5/D-6: Application for Preliminary Funding Status

605: (GCCM) Form D-5/D-6: Application for Preliminary Funding Status

D-5/D-6 (Application for Preliminary Funding Status)

The D-5 form is essentially a check-in during design phase but with some key assurances provided by the district. The Environmental Review (SEPA) is typically the most time-sensitive item to be submitted with the D-5 and the site review/building walkthrough with the district’s regional coordinator often occurs around this time, as well.  

The D-5 must be submitted to OSPI no later than one year from the D-4 issuance date.  

The D-6, or D-6(1) in the case of front-funded projects prior to their release of funds, is the approval document (with letter) issued for the D-5 per WAC 392-342-050. It is important to note that a D-6 will not be issued with non-front-funded projects until the funds are made available by the Legislature, July 15th of that project’s release year.  

D-5 Items Submission Checklist (For Design-Bid-Build Projects)

Item No. Item Notes
1 Resolution Certifying that the site will not create or aggravate racial imbalance  
2 Letter certifying that the school district has obtained capital funds for this project including the date of passage and type of capital funds available This letter must include the date the bond was passed and the bond amount
3 Statement of compliance with chapter 197-11 WAC SEPA rules and a copy of the lead agency decision at completion of the SEPA review process. The submission of compliance should include the statement from the district as well as the DNS or MDNS that shows the outcome. Obtaining SEPA can take some time, so be sure to plan accordingly in order to meet the requirements of D-5. 
4 Copy of school district’s board of director’s minutes approving education specifications This is acceptable as a resolution, as well, but the board meeting minutes will suffice. It does not have to be signed, as meeting minutes are typically signed and approved at the next board meeting. However, the language needs to clearly identify the project name and that education specifications are being addressed, and it must indicate that those education specifications were approved, not simply reviewed or looked at. 
5 If authority to proceed using local funds is desired, a letter stating the district’s intent to “front fund” the project must be submitted.  This can be combined with item number 3, the letter certifying that the district has obtained capital funds for the project.
6 High Performance: Preliminary Washington Sustainable Schools Protocol (WSSP) or LEED scorecard The newest version of the WSSP scorecard can be found on the OSPI School Facilities & Organization web page.
7

Alternative Public Works Uploads:

  • School Board approval to use GC/CM
  • Letter of approval from CPARB to use GC/CM
  • Copy of proposed bid package plan indicating scope, schedule and estimated cost of anticipated early bid packages and estimated date of final MACC negotiation
  • Each published advertisement and affidavit for GC/CM
  • Resolution certifying that the district intends to comply with RCW 39.10
 

Site Walkthrough with OSPI Regional Coordinator 

Pursuant to WAC 392-342-020, OSPI “together with the school district shall conduct a review and evaluation of sites for new and existing state funding assisted projects.” While not specifically a component of the D-5 requirements, this walkthrough is typically done with the regional coordinator around the time of the D-5 submission. With that said, school districts should refer to these guidelines prior to finalizing its selection of a site. 

In selecting sites for schools, a district shall consider the follow:  

  • The property upon which the school facility is or will be located is free of all encumbrances that would detrimentally interfere with the construction, operation, and useful life of the facility; 
  • The site is of sufficient size to meet the needs of the facility. The minimum acreage of the site should be five usable acres and one additional usable acre for each one hundred students or portion thereof of projected maximum enrollment plus an additional five usable acres if the school contains any grade above grade six. A district considering the use of a site that is less than the recommended minimum usable acreage should assure that: 
    • The health and safety of the students will not be in jeopardy (see Health & Safety Worksheet below); 
    • The internal spaces within the proposed facility will be adequate for the proposed educational program; 
    • The neighborhood in which the school facility is or will be situated will not be detrimentally impacted by lack of parking for students, employees, and the public; and 
    • The physical education and recreational program requirements will be met. 
  • A site review or predesign conference has been conducted with all appropriate local code agencies in order to determine design constraints; 
  • A geotechnical engineer has conducted a limited subsurface investigation to gather basic information regarding potential foundation and subgrade performance. 

Health & Safety Worksheet 

Like the site walkthrough, The Health & Safety worksheet is not technically part of the D-5 application but is often submitted at that time. While not submitting it at the time of the D-5 submission will not necessarily hold up the issuance of the D-6(1), for the project to be eligible to receive SCAP funding in that given release yet it will need to be submitted to and accepted by OSPI no later than June 30th of that year.  

The Health & Safety worksheet is a contributing factor for determining priority ranking of projects seeking SCAP funding assistance. (See Chapter 9: SCAP Priority System). 

606: (GCCM) Form D-7/D-8: Application to Negotiate the MACC

606: (GCCM) Form D-7/D-8: Application to Negotiate the MACC

D-7/D-8 (Application to Negotiate the MACC) 

On a GC/CM project, the D-7 is an application to begin or continue negotiating the final MACC agreement. The D-7 establishes the estimated project costs that are used in the D-8 and provides the basis for comparison with the actual costs submitted at the D-9. 

The D-7 must be submitted:

  1. No later than one year from the D-6 issuance date to stay in the D-Form process
  2. No later than June 30th of the project’s release of funds year if the district wishes to keep the project in that assigned release year. 

D-7 Items Submission Checklist (For General Contractor/Construction Management)

All D-Forms are submitted digitally through ICOS (See Chapter 2: Inventory and Condition of Schools)

Item No. Item Notes
1

Construction Management Services

  • Contract;
  • Plan
The contract should be signed and indicate the breakdown of CM costs for the project. Districts can claim staff hours for CM and/or a consultant fee. The CM plan is a one-to-three paragraph narrative, detailing whether the district is going to hire a consultant, claim in-house hours for CM, or both. 
2

Architect's Area Analysis Plan Diagram and Summary Table

The area analysis measures gross sf of the project (see "Area Definitions and Measurements" in Chapter 11: Advance Planning - The Study and Survey) for measuring guidance). This information certifies the sf of the project which helps finalize SCAP eligibility later in the D-Form process.

3

Contracts:

  1. Architectural and Engineering
  2. Educational Specifications
  3. Value Engineering
  4. Constructability Review
  5. Building Commissioning
  6. Energy Report (ELCCA)
The district will need to submit executed contracts/agreements/purchase orders/other for the items on the left, to include the total cost for the service. These costs need to match the summary of costs listed at the top of the D-7 form in ICOS. If the district is exempt from a cost, that cost would be listed as $0. In the case that the project is exempt from the ELCCA requirement, the PFEC is not eligible for SCAP funding assistance and should therefore be marked as $0. 
4

Letters of approval from:

  1. Fire Marshal (local or state)
  2. Electrical (local or state)
  3. Health Agency
  4. Building Official
  5. DES Review of Energy Report or PFEC
  6. On-Site Sewage (If applicable)
These letters are intended as a check to ensure there are no apparent hurdles that might slow or halt the project. This step often comes before project permitting, and local jurisdictions might wish to negotiate the language of the letter so as not to say “approved.” If this is the case, please contact your regional coordinator to determine what language might work for these letters to be accepted. 
5 General Conditions section of the Project Manual, or other documentation demonstrating that the contract documents reference the RCW's listed in the notes to the right
6

Value Engineering and Constructability Review Items

  1. Value Engineering Implementation Plan
  2. School district board acceptance of value engineering report and implementation
  3. Certification by the school district that a constructability review report was complete

The Value Engineering Implementation Plan should not include the entire VE Report. 

The board acceptance of VE can be a resolution or a simple upload of the minutes showing the VE report and implementation for the project was approved. It must be clear in the language that they were approved (not simply reviewed). The minutes do not need to be signed. A resolution would suffice in lieu of uploading meeting minutes. 

The third item on the list to the left need only be a letter signed by an authorized signee per the D-3 Resolution of Authorized Signatures. 
 

7 Complete listing of required special inspections and testing, in accordance with the applicable Washington State Building Code.  
8 Certification by the architect of compliance with state building code This item can be submitted in letter form

Area Analysis Plan Diagram for D-7

The area analysis diagram for the D-7 submission is a floor plan of the building that identifies the gross square footage of each project area and the proposed work within those areas. Building spaces should be measured in accordance with the "Area Definitions and Measurements" in Chapter 11. 

See the "Area Analysis and Plan Diagram" section of Chapter 11 for more guidance.

"Negotiating the MACC" and SCAP

Unlike Design-Bid-Build (DBB) projects, GC/CM projects may advertise, open, and award early subcontract bid packages before the D-8 is issued. These early bid packages, sometimes referred to as mini-MACC's, allow the GC/CM to procure portions of the work while the project continues through design and the SCAP approval process. The D-7 review therefore does not generally delay the award of early bid packages on a GC/CM project. 

Early bid packages may not include direct construction of the building or other work that constitutes breaking ground as defined by OSPI. See "Breaking Ground" in the Terms Used section of this manual's Introduction chapter. 

"Final GMP Amendment"

The Final Guaranteed Maximum Price (GMP) Amendment is the final amendment establishing the project's Guaranteed Maximum Price before building construction begins. While GC/CM projects may include one or more early bid packages prior to this point, those packages are limited to work that does not involve building construction. Activities such as foundation work, piling installation, structural concrete, or other work that initiates construction of the building may not begin until the Final GMP Amendment has been executed. For SCAP purposes, execution of the Final GMP Amendment serves a similar function to execution of the construction contract in a design-bid-build project. The D-10 or D-10(1) must be issued before the Final GMP Amendment can be executed or building construction can begin. 

For SCAP purposes, execution of the Final GMP Amendment serves a similar function to execution of the construction contract in a design-bid-build project and requires issuance of the D-10 or D-10(1).

607: (GCCM) Form D-9/D-10: Application for Authorization to Sign MACC Agreement

607: (GCCM) Form D-9/D-10: Application for Authorization to Sign MACC Agreement

D-9/D-10 (Application for Authorization to Sign MACC Agreement)

The D-9 is an application for the district to sign the Final MACC Agreement with the project's board-accepted contractor. These forms closely resemble the D-7 application, except that they use actual board-approved contract amounts rather than A/E estimates. The MACC Agreement cannot be signed until all D-9 requirements have been fulfilled and a D-10 or D-10(1) has been issued.

A D-10 or D-10(1) must be issued before a GC/CM project may execute the Final GMP Amendment, sign the MACC Agreement, or begin building construction, including foundation work, pilings, or other work associated with the building itself.

The D-9 must be submitted no more than 90 days from the D-8 issuance date unless an extension has been granted. 

D-9 Extension Request and Approval 

If the project is coming in at more than 10 percent of the estimated total project cost established by the D-8, then the district may request an extension of 90 extra days (for a total of 180 days from when the D-8 was issued) for submitting the D-9. The extension may be done only once per project, and OSPI approval is required.

To request an extended 90 days for submitting the D-9, the district should write a letter addressing its regional coordinator before the first 90 days are up.   

D-9 Items Submission Checklist (For GC/CM Projects)

All D-Forms are submitted digitally through ICOS (See Chapter 2: Inventory and Condition of Schools)

Item No. Item Notes
1 Copy of the MACC agreement without signatures This document must not be signed at this stage, as construction is not authorized until OSPI issues the D-10 or D-10(1)
3 School District board of directors' approval of the negotiated Maximum Allowable Construction Cost (MACC) This may be provided in the form of meeting minutes or a resolution. In either case, it must identify the approved MACC amount. 
4 Name and address of the GC/CM  
5 Statement of the specific amount of local and/or other disbursable funds available for funding this project This is a letter similar to what was submitted at D-5, but in this case the allotted amount for the project must be included and that amount must equal or exceed what is listed as the total project cost on the D-9. In addition, this letter must indicate that these funds are “disbursable.” 
6 School District board acceptance of the constructability review report and implementation This can be submitted as a resolution or board meeting minutes. In both cases, it must say that it has been approved. 
7 Resolution of Intent to construct project (WAC 392-344-130)  
8

Board Resolution(s) for Modernization Project:

  • 5-Year Use of Building
  • 30-Year Building Life
The sample template in ICOS includes these in the same resolution. This is acceptable and most common.
9

Final Billings for:

  • Education Specifications
  • Value Engineering
  • Constructability Review
  • Energy Report (ELCCA)
  • DES Energy Report Review fee
  • A/E Fee Calculation
  • Construction Management Fee Calculation

The district must submit final costs for these categories and show that they have been paid. If Ed Specs and the ELCCA were conducted by the architect, they need to be shown as separate line items and backed out of the A/E fee. 

These costs need to match the summary of costs listed at the top of the D-9 in ICOS. If the district is exempt from a cost, that cost would be listed as $0. In the case that the project is exempt from having to do an ELCCA, the PFEC and PFEC review by DES are not eligible for SCAP funding assistance and should therefore be marked as $0.

10

Certification that the district submitted information required by RCW 39.35D:

  • Design phase WSSP or LEED scorecard
  • Sustainable Building Energy Strategy
  • Energy Report (ELCCA) Executive Summary

Find the latest version of the WSSP scorecard on the OSPI High-Performance Schools web page.

For the Sustainable Building Energy Strategy, we will accept a two-to-four-page narrative of the selected WSSP points.