Chapter 7: Progressive Design-Build (PDB) D-Forms Process
Chapter 7: Progressive Design-Build (PDB) D-Forms ProcessUpdated August 2026
D-Forms serve as the official application process for accessing funds through the School Construction Assistance Program (SCAP). They are the primary documents that form the basis of agreements between OSPI and the school districts receiving SCAP fundings. See Chapter 3: School Construction Assistance Program (SCAP) Eligibility for more information.
This chapter provides guidance on the D-Form process as it applies to Progressive Design-Build projects.
701: (PDB) D-Forms Overview
701: (PDB) D-Forms OverviewEarly in the planning stage, a school district should work with its OSPI Regional Coordinator (See "Participants, Roles and Partnerships" in the Introduction section of this manual) to determine if it has School Construction Assistance Program (SCAP) eligibility that can be used toward one or multiple projects (See Chapter 3: School Construction Assistance Program Eligibility).
The application process of requesting SCAP funding assistance for a project begins with the submission of form D-3, OSPI approval of that form and then the issuance of form D-4. However, before a district can submit form D-3, it must have a completed and approved Study and Survey report, which verifies square footages of district facilities, updates the district long-term capital plan, looks at its bond-to-debt capacity, among other things. (See Chapter 11: Advanced Planning—The Study and Survey).
Once a project has begun the application process by being issued a D-4, there are several steps the district must reach during the design phase before it will be allowed to sign construction contracts (or, in the case of GC/CM and PDB projects, execute the final GMP). This chapter details each step of the D-Form, how those steps can vary depending on the project delivery method, key deadlines for districts to pay attention to, lessons learned and more.
SCAP is a unique grant program in that the funds are not yet available to be issued to the district at the point when it begins this application process. The purpose of the D-form process is to help OSPI track a project's status, and viability as it moved toward eligibility for state funding assistance.
In its current form, SCAP is mainly designed for a Design-Bid-Build (DBB) project delivery method but can also accommodate General Contractor/Construction Manager (GC/CM) and Design-Build (DB) methods. This chapter will outline the process of the D-Forms by the three procurement types it can accommodate (DBB, GC/CM and DB).
D-Forms Summary Chart (For Progressive Design-Build Projects)
| D-Form Application | Highlights | Approval (Issued by OSPI) | Deadline for Next D-Form Application |
|---|---|---|---|
| D-1: Study and Survey Grant Application |
|
D-2 | The district must have an updated and approved Study and Survey within six years of submitting a D-3. OSPI reserves the right to request an update to that Study and Survey within that six-year period. |
|
D-3: Project Application Occurs when submitted a project for SCAP funding |
|
D-4 | A D-5 is due one year (or sooner) after receiving a D-4 |
| D-5: Application for Preliminary Funding Status |
|
D-6 | A D-7 is due one year (or sooner) after receiving a D-6 or D-6(1) |
|
D-7: Application to Negotiate the Final GMP Amendment For PDB projects, a D-8 or D-8(1) (see "Front-Funding versus Non-Front-Funding" is not required before issuing early bid packages. Unlike Design-Bid-Build projects, where the D-8/D-8(1) is associated with authorization to proceed with the construction bid, PDB projects may proceed with early bid packages before the D-8/D-8(1) is issued. However, these early bid packages many not include construction on the building itself. |
|
D-8 |
A D-9 is due 90 days after receiving a D-8 or D-8(1). If the project is estimated at least 10 percent over budget and the school district can show that, it can request an extension of an extra 90 days. This must be approved by OSPI, however. |
|
D-9: Application for Authorization to Sign Final GMP Amendment A D-10 or D-10(1) must be received before the final GMP Amendment can be signed |
|
D-10 | Projects cannot break ground on building until D-10(1) or D-10. See "001: Terms Used" in the Introduction chapter for more information on "breaking ground." |
| D-11: Application to Release Retainage |
|
D-12 |
Contact your OSPI Regional Coordinator with questions.
702: (PDB) Form D-1/D-2: Study and Survey Grant Application
702: (PDB) Form D-1/D-2: Study and Survey Grant ApplicationThe D-1 is an application for reimbursement for the Study and Survey (See Chapter 11: Advance Planning--The Study and Survey). The intent of the Study and Survey is to update and have certified by an architect the school district’s facilities inventory, update its long-term capital plan, communicate the district’s financial status, among other things. This includes a PDF report submitted to OSPI, as well as an update of the inventory in ICOS. A Study and Survey must have been submitted and approved within six years of submitting a D-3 (application for SCAP funding support of a project). Once the D-1 has been submitted and the Study and Survey has been received and approved by OSPI, a D-2 is awarded allowing the district to submit a claim for reimbursement of the Study and Survey Grant Award.
703: (PDB) GMP Amendment Template
703: (PDB) GMP Amendment TemplateFor Progressive Design-Build projects, many project costs are typically lumped together within the Design-Build GMP. For SCAP purposes, these costs must be separately identified and allocated to the appropriate cost categories. Districts should begin tracking and separating these costs at the D-3 stage (and earlier, if appropriate) and maintain the breakout throughout the project as the GMP is developed and amended.
The cost breakdown will be required as part of the applicable D-7 and D-9 submissions. The template below is provided as a guide to the cost information that will be requested in those D-forms; the template itself does not need to be submitted. Amounts must reconcile to the applicable GMP amendment and, ultimately, the total Design-Build contract value.
GMP Amendment Template
Amendment #:
New or New-in-Lieu Construction Cost
| Category | Cost |
|---|---|
| Base Bid | $0.00 |
| Alternates | $0.00 |
| Base Bid + Alternates (Subtotal) = | $0.00 |
| 7% Eligible Tax | $0.00 |
| Sub Total = | $0.00 |
| 2% Local Excess Tax | $0.00 |
| Total = | $0.00 |
Architectural and Engineering Fees
| Category | Cost |
|---|---|
| New Construction | $0.00 |
| Modernization | $0.00 |
| Non-Matchable | $0.00 |
| Total A/E Fees = | $0.00 |
Other Services (including Design-Build GMP Contract)
| Category | Cost |
|---|---|
| Educational Specifications | $0.00 |
| Energy Report (ELCCA) | $0.00 |
| Value Engineering Report (Must be facilitated by a SAVE-certified facilitator) | $0.00 |
| Constructability Review Report | $0.00 |
| Total = | $0.00 |
| Category | Cost |
|---|---|
| FINAL GMP AMENDMENT = | $0.00 |
NOTE: Total of all tables should total the GMP Amendment Amount
Modernization Construction Cost
| Category | Cost |
|---|---|
| Base Bid | $0.00 |
| Alternates | $0.00 |
| Base Bid + Alternates (Subtotal) = | $0.00 |
| 7% Eligible Tax | $0.00 |
| Sub Total = | $0.00 |
| 2% Local Excess Tax | $0.00 |
| Total = | $0.00 |
Other Non-Matchable Cost
| Category | Cost |
|---|---|
| Offsite Work | $0.00 |
| Building Demolition | $0.00 |
| Hazardous Material Abatement | $0.00 |
| Sub Total = | $0.00 |
| 9% Total Tax | $0.00 |
| Total = | $0.00 |
704: Front-Funding versus Non-Front-Funding
704: Front-Funding versus Non-Front-FundingFront-funding is when a district applying for SCAP funding certifies that it has the financial capacity to pay the full project cost without relying on the state assistance. The district may proceed past a D-8 with the project before SCAP funding is available. Historically, SCAP funding has been released annually in July. However, funding is not guaranteed until the Legislature passes the capital budget. Once the capital budget is passed and the project has met the applicable funding milestones, OSPI releases the state assistance funds.
Front-funding allows the district to proceed with bidding and construction before the annual July release of state assistance funds. If a district is dependent on the state's share of project funding, the project cannot be front-funded and is therefore considered non-front-funded. In that case, bidding and construction activities must be scheduled to occur after the state assistance funds have been released. This does not apply to mini-MACC's or early work packages involving non-building construction in GC/CM and Progressive Design-Build projects. These activities may proceed before the release of state assistance funds; however, the school district assumes the financial risk for proceeding before those funds are available.
What the "(1)" Means
For front-funded projects whose SCAP funds have not yet been released, OSPI issues a D-6(1), D-8(1), and D-10(1) in place of the standard D-6, D-8, and D-10. The "(1)" designation indicates that the project has been authorized to proceed under the front-funding provisions, but the project's SCAP funds have not yet been released. Once the state assistance funds are released, OSPI issues a standard D-10, replacing the D-10(1), to confirm that the project's SCAP funds have been secured. The "(1)" designation also authorizes the project to proceed with applicable milestones that would otherwise require the state funds to have been released.
705: (PDB) Form D-3/D-4: Application for Project Approval
705: (PDB) Form D-3/D-4: Application for Project ApprovalD-3/D-4 (Application for Project Approval)
The D-3 is an application for state funding assistance for a new, new-in-lieu (replacement) or modernization project with state funding assistance.
After a district has secured or is near to securing local funds through a bond, levy, impact fees or other source. Projects cannot proceed past D-4 if local funds are not yet secured. Submit an individual D-3 for separate projects.
D-4 approvals are issued by OSPI on the 15th day of every month. D-3 forms must be submitted at least four-to-six weeks prior to the D-4 issuance date.
Key D-4 Dates:
-
The last business day in October before the November 15th D-4 issuance date is the final opportunity to capture the prior year's enrollment projections (Form 1049).
-
A project must have received a D-4 by January 31st, and the district must be able to certify funding for the project (either total project costs or local share) to be eligible for that year's release of funds.
D-3 Items Submission Checklist (For GC/CM Projects)
| Item No. | Item | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Resolution with Signatures of Authorized District Personnel | This determines who at the district will have signing rights for this project throughout the D-Form process. See "Setting Up D-Form Authorized Signees" below. |
| 2 | Resolution: New-in-Lieu Replacement Option (If Applicable) | For new-in-lieu (replacement option) only. This resolution holds that the district will not use the space that is being replaced using SCAP funds for any K-12 instructional purposes henceforth. (WAC 392-347-042) |
| 3 | Form 1066: Students with Disabilities Enrollment | Counts the number of students with developmental disabilities (as reported on actual October headcount enrollment) who are assigned to a specially designated self-contained classroom for at least 100 minutes per school day and pre-kindergarten students with disabilities at 50 percent of the actual headcount enrollment. |
Setting up D-Form Authorize Signees
Individuals included on the Resolution with Signatures of Authorized District Personnel will each need to create an EDS account to be able to sign D-Forms (this can be done at https://eds.ospi.k12.wa.us) and then given access to the district’s ICOS profile (see "Set up and Access" in Chapter 2: Inventory and Condition of Schools)
The project architect will also need to have an EDS account and have access to the district’s ICOS profile in order to e-sign the Estimate of Construction at D-7.
706: (PDB) Form D-5/D-6: Application for Preliminary Funding Status
706: (PDB) Form D-5/D-6: Application for Preliminary Funding StatusD-5/D-6 (Application for Preliminary Funding Status)
The D-5 form is essentially a check-in during design phase but with some key assurances provided by the district. The Environmental Review (SEPA) is typically the most time-sensitive item to be submitted with the D-5 and the site review/building walkthrough with the district’s regional coordinator often occurs around this time, as well.
The D-5 must be submitted to OSPI no later than one year from the D-4 issuance date.
The D-6, or D-6(1) in the case of front-funded projects prior to their release of funds, is the approval document (with letter) issued for the D-5 per WAC 392-342-050. It is important to note that a D-6 will not be issued with non-front-funded projects until the funds are made available by the Legislature, July 15th of that project’s release year.
D-5 Items Submission Checklist (For Design-Bid-Build Projects)
| Item No. | Item | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Resolution Certifying that the site will not create or aggravate racial imbalance | |
| 2 | Letter certifying that the school district has obtained capital funds for this project including the date of passage and type of capital funds available | This letter must include the date the bond was passed and the bond amount |
| 3 | Statement of compliance with chapter 197-11 WAC SEPA rules and a copy of the lead agency decision at completion of the SEPA review process. | The submission of compliance should include the statement from the district as well as the DNS or MDNS that shows the outcome. Obtaining SEPA can take some time, so be sure to plan accordingly in order to meet the requirements of D-5. |
| 4 | Copy of school district’s board of director’s minutes approving education specifications | This is acceptable as a resolution, as well, but the board meeting minutes will suffice. It does not have to be signed, as meeting minutes are typically signed and approved at the next board meeting. However, the language needs to clearly identify the project name and that education specifications are being addressed, and it must indicate that those education specifications were approved, not simply reviewed or looked at. |
| 5 | If authority to proceed using local funds is desired, a letter stating the district’s intent to “front fund” the project must be submitted. | This can be combined with item number 3, the letter certifying that the district has obtained capital funds for the project. |
| 6 | High Performance: Preliminary Washington Sustainable Schools Protocol (WSSP) or LEED scorecard | The newest version of the WSSP scorecard can be found on the OSPI School Facilities & Organization web page. |
| 7 |
Alternative Public Works Uploads:
|
Site Walkthrough with OSPI Regional Coordinator
Pursuant to WAC 392-342-020, OSPI “together with the school district shall conduct a review and evaluation of sites for new and existing state funding assisted projects.” While not specifically a component of the D-5 requirements, this walkthrough is typically done with the regional coordinator around the time of the D-5 submission. With that said, school districts should refer to these guidelines prior to finalizing its selection of a site.
In selecting sites for schools, a district shall consider the follow:
- The property upon which the school facility is or will be located is free of all encumbrances that would detrimentally interfere with the construction, operation, and useful life of the facility;
- The site is of sufficient size to meet the needs of the facility. The minimum acreage of the site should be five usable acres and one additional usable acre for each one hundred students or portion thereof of projected maximum enrollment plus an additional five usable acres if the school contains any grade above grade six. A district considering the use of a site that is less than the recommended minimum usable acreage should assure that:
- The health and safety of the students will not be in jeopardy (see Health & Safety Worksheet below);
- The internal spaces within the proposed facility will be adequate for the proposed educational program;
- The neighborhood in which the school facility is or will be situated will not be detrimentally impacted by lack of parking for students, employees, and the public; and
- The physical education and recreational program requirements will be met.
- A site review or predesign conference has been conducted with all appropriate local code agencies in order to determine design constraints;
- A geotechnical engineer has conducted a limited subsurface investigation to gather basic information regarding potential foundation and subgrade performance.
707: (PDB) Form D-7/D-8: Application to Proceed with Bid Openings
707: (PDB) Form D-7/D-8: Application to Proceed with Bid OpeningsD-7/D-8 (Application to Negotiate the Final GMP)
On a Progressive Design-Build project, the D-7 is considered an application to begin or continue negotiating the final GMP agreement. On a Progressive Design-Build project, the D-7 is an application to begin or continue negotiating the Final GMP. The D-7 establishes the estimated project costs that are used in the D-8 and provides the basis for comparison with the actual costs submitted at the D-9.
The D-7 must be submitted:
- No later than one year from the D-6 issuance date to stay in the D-Form process
- No later than June 30th of the project’s release of funds year if the district wishes to keep the project in that assigned release year.
D-7 Items Submission Checklist (For Progressive Design-Build)
All D-Forms are submitted digitally through ICOS (See Chapter 2: Inventory and Condition of Schools)
| Item No. | Item | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Construction Management Services
|
The contract should be signed and indicate the breakdown of CM costs for the project. Districts can claim staff hours for CM and/or a consultant fee. The CM plan is a one-to-three paragraph narrative, detailing whether the district is going to hire a consultant, claim in-house hours for CM, or both. |
| 2 |
Architect's Area Analysis Plan Diagram and Summary Table |
The area analysis measures gross sf of the project (see "Area Definitions and Measurements" in Chapter 11: Advance Planning - The Study and Survey) for measuring guidance). This information certifies the sf of the project which helps finalize SCAP eligibility later in the D-Form process. |
| 3 |
Contracts:
|
The district will need to submit executed contracts/agreements/purchase orders/other for the items on the left, to include the total cost for the service. These costs need to match the summary of costs listed at the top of the D-7 form in ICOS. If the district is exempt from a cost, that cost would be listed as $0. In the case that the project is exempt from having to do an ELCCA, the PFEC is not eligible for SCAP funding assistance and should therefore be marked as $0. |
| 4 |
Letters of approval from:
|
These letters are intended as a check to ensure there are no apparent hurdles that might slow or halt the project. This step often comes before project permitting, and local jurisdictions might wish to negotiate the language of the letter so as not to say “approved.” If this is the case, please contact your regional coordinator to determine what language might work for these letters to be accepted. |
| 5 | General Conditions section of the Project Manual, or other documentation demonstrating that the contract documents reference the RCW's listed in the notes to the right |
|
| 6 |
Value Engineering and Constructability Review Items
|
The Value Engineering Implementation Plan should not include the entire VE Report. The board acceptance of VE can be a resolution or a simple upload of the minutes showing the VE report and implementation for the project was approved. It must be clear in the language that they were approved (not simply reviewed). The minutes do not need to be signed. A resolution would suffice in lieu of uploading meeting minutes. The third item on the list to the left need only be a letter signed by an authorized signee per the D-3 Resolution of Authorized Signatures. |
| 7 | Complete listing of required special inspections and testing, in accordance with the applicable Washington State Building Code. | |
| 8 | Certification by the architect of compliance with state building code | This item can be submitted in letter form |
Area Analysis Plan Diagram for D-7
The area analysis diagram for the D-7 submission is a floor plan of the building that identifies the gross square footage of each project area and the proposed work within those areas. Building spaces should be measured in accordance with the "Area Definitions and Measurements" in Chapter 11.
See the "Area Analysis and Plan Diagram" section of Chapter 11 for more guidance.
"Negotiating the Final GMP" and SCAP
Unlike Design-Bid-Build (DBB) projects, Progressive Design-Build (PDB) projects may proceed with early bid packages before the D-8 is issued. These early work packages allow the design-builder to advance portions of the project while design, scope, and pricing for the overall project continue to be progressively developed through the PDB process. The D-7 therefore does not generally delay the authorization of early work packages on a PDB project.
Early work packages may not include direct construction of the building or other work that constitutes breaking ground as defined by OSPI. See "Breaking Ground" in the Terms Used section of this manual's Introduction chapter.
"Final GMP Amendment"
For SCAP purposes, on a Progressive Design-Build project, the Final GMP Amendment establishes the Guaranteed Maximum Price (GMP) that OSPI will recognize for the construction phase of the project. The GMP may be subject to adjustments under the terms of the construction contract after this point; however, such adjustments do not increase the amount of construction costs eligible for SCAP assistance.
The Final GMP Amendment must be executed before building construction begins and cannot be signed until OSPI has issued a D-10 or D-10(1). See "Breaking Ground" in the Terms Used section of this manual's Introduction chapter for OSPI's definition.
Any increase to the GMP or additional construction costs incurred after the Final GMP Amendment are not eligible for additional SCAP assistance, regardless of whether the increase is processed through an amendment to the construction contract.
708: (PDB) Form D-9/D-10: Application for Authorization to Final GMP Amendment
708: (PDB) Form D-9/D-10: Application for Authorization to Final GMP AmendmentD-9/D-10 (Application for Authorization to Sign Final GMP Amendment)
The D-9 is an application for the district to sign the Final GMP Amendment with the project's Board-accepted contractor. Note that these forms closely resemble the D-7 application, except that they use actual board-approved contract amounts, not A/E estimates. The Final GMP Amendment cannot be signed until all D-9 requirements are fulfilled and a D-10 is issued.
The D-9 must be submitted no more than 90 days from the D-8 issuance date unless an extension has been granted.
A D-10 or D-10(1) must be issued before a PDB project may execute the Final GMP Amendment and begin building construction, including foundation work, pilings, or any other work associated with the building itself. For SCAP purposes, on a Progressive Design-Build project, the Final GMP Amendment establishes the Guaranteed Maximum Price (GMP) that OSPI will recognize for the construction phase of the project.
D-9 Extension Request and Approval
If the project is coming in at more than 10 percent over the estimated total project cost established by the D-8, the district may request and extension of 90 extra days (for a total of 180 days from when the D-8 was issued) for submitting the D-9. This may be done only once per project.
To request an extended 90 days for submitting the D-9, the district should write a letter addressing its regional coordinator before the first 90 days are up.
D-9 Items Submission Checklist (For Progressive Design-Build Projects)
All D-Forms are submitted digitally through ICOS (See Chapter 2: Inventory and Condition of Schools). Please note that the item numbering may differ from your project in ICOS, as some items are contingent on the type of project (e.g., modernization, new construction, or replacement).
| Item No. | Item | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Copy of the final Guaranteed Maximum Price (GMP) Amendment without signatures | This GMP amendment establishes the total construction-phase project cost that OSPI will recognize and should match the amount entered on the ICOS D-9 Form. This document must not be signed at this stage, as construction is not authorized until OSPI issues the D-10 or D-10(1) |
| 2 | School District board of directors' approval of the final GMP Amendment | This may be provided in the form of meeting minutes or a resolution. In either case, it must include the Final GMP amount, which must match the amount identified in the Final GMP Amendment. If meeting minutes are provided, they must also state that the Final GMP amount was approved by the board. |
| 3 | Statement of the specific amount of local and/or other disbursable funds available for funding this project | This is a letter similar to what was submitted at D-5, but in this case the allotted amount for the project must be included and that amount must equal or exceed what is listed as the total project cost on the D-9. In addition, this letter must indicate that these funds are “disbursable.” |
| 4 | School District board acceptance of the constructability review report and implementation | This may be provided as a resolution or board meeting minutes. In either case, it must say that it was approved by the board. |
| 5 | Resolution of Intent to construct project (WAC 392-344-130) | |
| 6 |
Board Resolution(s) for Modernization Project:
|
The sample template in ICOS includes these in the same resolution. This is acceptable and most common. |
| 7 |
Final Billings for:
|
The district must submit the final costs for these categories and provide documentation showing that the costs have been paid. If the Ed Specs and ELCCA were completed by the architect, they must be identified as separate line items and deducted from the A/E fee. (See GMP Amendment Template in this chapter). These costs must match the summary of costs listed at the top of the D-9 in ICOS. If the district is exempt from a particular cost, that cost should be entered as $0. If the project is exempt from the ELCCA requirement, the PFEC and PFEC review by DES are not eligible for SCAP funding assistance and should therefore be entered as $0. |
| 8 |
Certification that the district submitted information required by RCW 39.35D
|
Find the latest version of the WSSP scorecard on the OSPI High-Performance Schools web page. For the Sustainable Building Energy Strategy, we will accept a two-to-four-page narrative of the selected WSSP points. |